Site Performance

smcculloch posted on June 20, 2005 06:43

Which performs better?

I'll tell you how much each costs after some feedback..

Posted in: General

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (7)

| Kick it! | DZone it! | del.icio.us

Post Rating

12345

Comments

# TSchwingle

Monday, June 20, 2005 7:08 AM

Scott,

The site asp... is considerably faster.

# internetcreative

Monday, June 20, 2005 7:17 AM

I agree with W. Todd Schwingle.

# Anonymous

Monday, June 20, 2005 7:53 AM

Scott, for me, located in Melbourne, they load roughly at the same speed.

Pinging this site, I get an average of 190ms, the other 205,206...

HTH

# stipe76

Monday, June 20, 2005 8:01 AM

That post was made by me :)

# nbc

Monday, June 20, 2005 8:18 AM

According to your own page generated stat smcculloch.net came up in 1sec and aspdotnetnukehost .625 sec but I don't know what that all means - so many factors!

# Aeros

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 7:51 AM

www.aspdotnetnukehost.net is much faster for me as well US, PA.

# nina

Thursday, June 23, 2005 9:24 PM

asp site was faster for me and I'm in melbourne.
Nina

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Enter the code shown above:

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail