|
|
smcculloch posted on June 20, 2005 06:43
Which performs better?
I'll tell you how much each costs after some feedback..
Monday, June 20, 2005 7:08 AM
Scott, The site asp... is considerably faster.
Monday, June 20, 2005 7:17 AM
I agree with W. Todd Schwingle.
Monday, June 20, 2005 7:53 AM
Scott, for me, located in Melbourne, they load roughly at the same speed. Pinging this site, I get an average of 190ms, the other 205,206... HTH
Monday, June 20, 2005 8:01 AM
That post was made by me :)
Monday, June 20, 2005 8:18 AM
According to your own page generated stat smcculloch.net came up in 1sec and aspdotnetnukehost .625 sec but I don't know what that all means - so many factors!
Tuesday, June 21, 2005 7:51 AM
www.aspdotnetnukehost.net is much faster for me as well US, PA.
Thursday, June 23, 2005 9:24 PM
asp site was faster for me and I'm in melbourne. Nina
|